A budget laptop for working in Photoshop. Choosing a laptop for a photographer. RAM and hard disk

The work of an amateur photographer and even more so a professional is simply impossible without a productive computer. The reason for this is the need for digital image processing. The specifics of the work of a photographer is associated with some requirements for the worker. It must have the appropriate characteristics. Processing photos in RAW format requires a certain amount of RAM, processor clock speed. The quality of the matrix and its diagonal are crucial. Accurate color rendering is required. Not every computer can satisfy all the requirements. Next, we will tell you in detail: what characteristics should a laptop for a photographer have and consider the main models that are best purchased today.

When it comes to a photographer or filmmaker, we're a pretty picky group, especially when it comes to choosing the right laptop. No hard edges prefer a much smoother feel when picking up or carrying your laptop. It also seems to be pretty durable. The mix of gray aluminum and matte black accents really help it stand out from other laptops out there in the field. On the inside of the laptop, you'll find a black and gray checkered look that some might call "black carbon".

Bright color accurate display

In addition to the impressive resolution and detail found on the display, this one has two other pretty awesome features. One of the best viewing experience you can get on a laptop. For working with photos and videos, color plays a much more significant role than for the average user. The bottom line is that colors are vibrant and rich, while delivering an impressive level of color accuracy right out of the box.

What characteristics should it have?

When choosing a laptop for a photographer, first of all, you should pay attention to the operating parameters of the following components:

processor;
video cards;
random access memory;
hard disk;
interfaces;
screen.

CPU

The choice in favor of a particular processor should be made based on its mode of operation. Since the higher the performance, the shorter the time will be autonomous work... Suitable for stationary use Intel Core i7. It is efficient, has a high clock frequency, and requires a large amount of power to operate. If the laptop will be used "on the road", which implies autonomous operation, the best solution would be a Core i5 or Core i3. These CPUs are fast enough without stressing the laptop battery.

While this is light for a 15-inch laptop, it's over a pound heavier than many 13-inch ultrabooks. Plus, while battery life isn't impressive, an optional accessory could add another 9 hours of use to the device, which we'll talk about shortly.

As most of you probably know, video work is where most laptops usually struggle. That's precious battery life that most of us love and enjoy. When it comes to more powerful apps, you can expect to get closer to 5 to 3 hours of use.

Video card

The video card should be given maximum attention. In a laptop for a photographer, it must be discrete. Integrated into an Intel HD processor or similar will not work. must have its own RAM, and for comfortable processing of photos in RAW format it must be at least 2 GB.

While this isn't great news for us portable laptop lackeys, there are some savings. The inside of the laptop picks up the oil it naturally finds in the hands. ... A device that allows them to take the energy and efficiency of their office, tune in on the road with the least amount of compromise. It has a solid dignity with quality materials that help it look like a premium product. With almost no bezel, the screen looks like it runs from edge to edge, allowing all the detail and vibrant colors to have plenty of room to stretch their legs.

The optimal solution would be the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M. But at the same time, it is the processor that is the most important component of a laptop for a photographer. If there is a choice of a powerful CPU or a powerful video processor, you must purchase the first one.

RAM

The more RAM a laptop has and the higher the frequency of its operation, the better. There is never too much memory. When choosing a laptop model for photo processing, you should purchase equipped not less than 8 GB of RAM.

It also doesn't hurt that you can download games like the latest Tomb Rising or even Division and play them along the way. The superficial book spoiled me when it came to this. Finally, my very a big problem is that the material used for the interior of the laptop seems to be a magnet for the oil found naturally in our hands. That being said, all of my thoughts and opinions in this review are my own and based on my own experiences using this laptop around the world in places like Iceland and Norway.

There are many different memory models, types. Preference should be given to DDR 3 and DDR 4. The optimal solution would be a device with a RAM frequency of at least 2,133 MHz. The best is with an effective frequency of 3 200 MHz. With these parameters, the bandwidth will be 8 × 3200 = 25.6 MB / s.

HDD

First of all, when choosing a disk, you should focus on the way you use it:

Finding a good laptop for photographers is challenging

Maintaining the credibility of continuing to provide unbiased feedback is incredibly important to me. It is much easier to find a good desktop computer for photo editing than a laptop. Photo enhancement work is easier to do on a larger monitor, allowing many windows to be opened.

If you have to deal with a huge amount of photos, it can take a very long time for them to import them from the camera if your computer lacks ports that provide high transfer rates. But even photographers are moving towards using laptop computers rather than desktops. Convenience of working with photos in different places, rather than being tied to a workstation. is an important consideration. Also, if you are using your computer for other work, but photography is your hobby, you probably want a laptop, even if one that allows you to edit your images.

for storing photos;
for processing.

In the first case, the size of the disk should be at least 1 TB - since the source of one photo often takes more than a dozen megabytes. If you only need to carry out image processing, only 128 GB will be enough. In this case, you should opt for an SSD - solid state drive.

Big images need big processors

So what do you need to look for when you are considering purchasing a laptop, and what are the best laptops for photo editing?

What to look for in a laptop for photographers

One of the problems with determining the minimum specifications required for photo editing is that “photo editing” encompasses many sins. Typically, to figure out how powerful your rig needs to be, you need to consider your camera. In addition, some applications, such as high dynamic range processing or panoramas, are quite CPU intensive.

Interfaces

For comfortable work, the photographer will need the following interfaces on a laptop:

card reader that works with SD cards and others;
at least 4 USB ports;
HDMI;
Wi-FI.

Screen

The first thing to consider when choosing a laptop for photo processing is the screen size. It makes no sense to purchase a PC with this parameter, which is less than 15.6 inches. The optimal solution is 17 or more.

Find the following features in your laptop. They also have narrow viewing angles, so you need to look directly at the monitor to see the image correctly.

However, they are increasingly used on laptops and are especially important for photographers.
Many photographers and painters prefer matte screens.

This article is divided into two parts, specifications and our recommended systems. To understand what you are buying, read the specifications section. To save time, just go to my recommended systems.

Official specs versus my recommended specs

All systems are pre-built. Below are the reasons for my recommendation. In short, a quad-core processor won't be significantly faster than a dual-core processor. Getting 4-cores is recommended if other applications you have can use the cores.

Again, you need to focus on the scope of the device. If the laptop will be used in the studio, for photo demonstration, for work on trips, you should not chase the size. If it will be used permanently, for retouching, a large diagonal is simply necessary. The situation is similar with the permit. The larger it is, the easier it is to work with the photo.

It is important to get the clock speed of the processor as quickly as possible. This is where you should know. They are great for storing huge files or files that you don't use often, and are good for purposes. Reserve copy... Storage is often the performance bottleneck on any system.

A scraper disk is a temporary storage space for memory, such as caches for your open files... You can use the storage as a scratch disc. Nowadays, it would be difficult to buy a monitor or laptop that runs at low resolutions.

Rating laptops for photographers

For home use of a laptop, the following models are best suited for a photographer:

Apple Macbook Pro with a 15.4-inch screen;
Republic of Gamers G74SX with a diagonal of 17.3 inches;
Republic of Gamers G751JL with a diagonal of 17.3 inches.

The last 2 models are performance PCs from ASUS. The performance and image quality on the screen are at the highest level.

Most laptop screens are glossy these days. Glossy screens present colors more vividly than matte screens. The main difference comes down to the interface, as well as minor differences in usability. All of the systems below meet my recommended minimum specifications.

An external hard drive is available for additional capacity. Budget. For budget monitors High Quality check out this list. Normal laptops range from 6 to 3 inches. Some laptops need to be manually calibrated to get the best color reproduction, but a colorimeter is required for correct operation.

If the budget is limited, or if you need mobility, use on the road, in the studio, and often carry around, you should opt for a laptop:

Acer aspire E5-551G, Aspire E5-573G-76KH or Aspire Nitro VN7-792G-52S0;
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E555.

The diagonal of the screen is 15.6 inches on these models.

Conclusion

Choosing a laptop for a photographer is a responsible procedure that requires an individual approach. You should prepare for it in advance. First of all, it is necessary to determine the budget and tasks that the personal computer will solve. Based on these two points, it will be possible to make a choice. If a certain model has already been chosen, it is worthwhile to carefully study its characteristics, specification - and only then purchase it. Performance is critical. Comfortable work in Photoshop and LightRoom is possible only with sufficient memory and appropriate processing power.

Until recently, laptops lagged behind tablets in terms of screen resolution, but now several models offer ultra-high resolutions. Laptop replacement desktops typically only last a few hours, but ultra-portable devices often last for 8-10 hours on a single charge.

The best laptops for photographers

This is one of the most inexpensive ultra-thin metal laptops available. However, after calibration, the performance was excellent. It's still lightweight and small enough to carry in a bag all day, and it lasts up to 11 hours from a charge. It also has a professional graphics card.

Apple products seem insanely expensive, especially when comparing cheap mainstream laptops to the Apple MacBook Pro. But when you start looking for a quality IPS screen for editing photos and videos, good keyboard and touch pad(touchpad or clickpad), long battery life, it turns out that the overpayment for a Macbook is not that great. Moreover, in addition to iron, you also get operating system Mac OS, which is becoming more popular after the infamous Windows updates 8.

This means Yoga 2 can provide a tablet-like experience, as well as a laptop and the keyboard can double as a stand, turning it into a super-powerful frame. If strength and mobility are paramount, Yoga 2 is a great choice. It offers up to eight hours of battery life and weighs just 66kg - perfect for long days of shooting.

It's safe to say that laptops are a photographer's best friend. With options like cloud storage The ability to edit and upload photos to the box comes in handy. However, the choice best laptop for photography, this is not an easy task.

On the market personal computers stagnation. In this regard, Intel even froze the construction of an American plant for the production of new generation processors worth $ 5 billion. And this is not surprising. Many buyers bought tablets and it turned out that for the consumption of content (watching video, listening to audio, surfing the Internet, social networks, games) they are quite enough. At the same time, the power of processors has increased very slightly in recent years. Switching to the latest Intel Haswell processor with Ivy Bridge makes sense at all if you want to reduce power consumption, because the performance gain is only 10-15%.

Laptops with Haswell processors have really made big improvements in battery life, as well as in the speed of accessing the SSD and integrated graphics card. This also applies to Macbook laptops. If long battery life is important, then you should not take laptops with previous generations of processors.

There are so many factors to consider, and even then, there is a problem in understanding important terms. The fact that there are hundreds of laptops on the market does not make things easier. This guide aims to make your search easier by highlighting the features to look for when editing photos. He will also review the best models.

Quick Facts: Our Top 5 Photo Editing Laptops

Benefits of using a laptop for photography

Modern laptops have made photography more convenient and easier to create quality content. This has facilitated photo editing and other practical aspects that enhance the convenience that photography demands.

AMD processors are very rare in laptops, mainly in the lower segments. Intel is represented by a huge lineup. Even if the processor is designated as Core i7, you need to carefully look at the labeling. Of the Core i7 family, low-voltage (ultramobile, not mobile) Core i7-4500u, or even Core i7-4200u, are now most often found. They have reduced the number of cores, the frequency, so they cannot boast of performance (it can be 2 times less!), But the power consumption is at an excellent level. That is why they are most often found on Ultrabooks. On larger laptops, Intel Core i7-4700MQ, 4702MQ, 4700HQ, 4702HQ are more often found in performance, the integrated graphics are better, but the power consumption is also significantly higher.

Ability to work on several projects at once

One of the benefits of laptops for photography is that they allow professionals to work on multiple projects at the same time. It also allows them to provide services to many people. With a camera that shoots and uploads software for photo editing, publishing images and delivering them instantly to customers is easier than ever.

Laptops offer more photography features than desktop computers. These include superb screen resolution to ensure accurate viewing of photos under enhancement. This makes it easy for professionals to install photos in all the necessary components without interfering with other leading features.

But if you understand the hardware, then it is better to look at the comparison of specific processors of the models of interest. You can find many examples that many new Intel Haswell processors are mostly just marketing, when the power consumption differs from the previous generation by only 1-3 W / h, and the performance has increased by only 5-10%. Therefore, do not deny yourself the pleasure of comparing core i5 and core i7, especially if the former are high-grade, and the latter are low-voltage.

Improved display capabilities provide greater clarity than desktops, while a lightweight design allows individuals to complete projects on the go. Thanks to the central processing unit, notebooks have high processing technology. This is also important when running multiple projects at the same time. The massive storage capabilities of laptops make them the preferred hardware component over desktop computers. They can store large files securely, which is unlike desktops, which often require external hard disks.

In general, if you edit photos and videos in a stationary environment, and not on the road, then taking a laptop does not make much sense. Power stationary computer will be much higher, plus you can put a normal graphics card and provide it with cooling. Laptops also use middling video cards like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M, but they can have a significant impact on power consumption (when the laptop cannot switch to integrated video when needed). In addition, a powerful video card requires good cooling, which can increase the noise level, and laptop components can get hotter and fail prematurely. Moreover, users rarely think about the fact that laptops need to be cleaned of dust in order for coolers (fans) to work properly.

At the same time, more and more laptop manufacturers have entered the pixel race following the arrival of the Macbook with Retina displays. In this case, the most often used resolution is not 4K UHD (3840 × 2160) or 4096 × 2160, but something in between and FullHD (1920 × 1080). But since Youtube and Vimeo already allow you to upload videos with a resolution of up to 4096x3072, broadcasting in 4K format in the United States is not far off, camcorders with 4K resolution have begun to appear on the market, then the appearance of laptops and monitors with such a resolution is not far off. Moreover, the first models will be very expensive and will certainly drop sharply in price in a year, as has already happened with touch screens.

On the other hand, the capacities of current solid state drives (SSDs) are too small, the volumes hard drives recently, they also do not double once every 1-2 years, as before. In addition, the integrated Intel graphics, even if it is Crystallwell (Iris Pro graphics 5200), is still too weak to support high resolutions (despite the fact that the performance does not reach the level of average mobile discrete cards like the NVidia GT 750M, and even the temperature can not boast maybe). In this case, of course, the power consumption of the low-voltage core i7 together with the integrated video Iris Pro can be at the level of a discrete video card. Although, for example, the Lenovo Yoga 2 Pro uses an even weaker integrated video Intel HD Graphics 4400, while the resolution is 3200x1800. This, coupled with the scaling problems of Windows 8, leads to a negative impression of such solutions. A small part of the Metro apps in Windows 8 (intended primarily for tablets and touch screens) of course already know how to work with high resolutions, and the situation will only get better. But in this moment Of course, rushing to update hardware unnecessarily does not make much sense.

Another problem with laptops is the quality of the screens. In the mass segment, it is very mediocre, completely unsuitable for professional video and photo processing. More expensive models can also be using IPS technology (or similar MVA, PVA, PPS). Compared to the matrix based on the simplest TN + film technology, IPS offers viewing angles increased up to 178 °, high contrast and color reproduction. At the same time, at the moment, IPS displays on laptops 15-17 inches are very rare, besides, their color quality on cheap models leaves much to be desired.

It is not for nothing that many professionals for video and photo processing offer to purchase either a desktop computer, including an iMac, or a laptop and a good large IPS monitor for it. As for the iMac, it is worth considering the complexity of their upgrade. Latest 21.5-inch iMacs don't even allow for more memory in a simple way(for this you need to remove the screen and disassemble the floor of the computer). The latest generation 27-inch iMacs allow you to increase the memory size, but you will also have to remove the screen to replace the hard drive (including the SSD).

Segment Windows computers, like the iMac, also consists of All-in-one (AIO) solutions, which means all-in-one. Often, manufacturers of such solutions follow the path of Apple, making it very difficult to update computers. Among the exceptions is the 27-inch Dell XPS 2720 with a quality QHD (2560 x 1440) IPS display. Upgrading the Dell XPS 2720 is very easy, just unscrew a few screws and remove back cover... In addition to the upgrade in this segment, you should also pay attention to the processors used. Despite the huge dimensions of such devices, they often use mobile processors, including low-voltage ones. This is also due to the fact that some manufacturers offer to use such computers as huge tablets (and the Haswell desktop power consumption is not at the best level, including in comparison with the previous generation processors). In addition, often such solutions do not have a discrete video card (they use only integrated graphics) or simple-medium video cards (which can also be found on laptops). Haswell's graphics performance has increased significantly, but still this segment of computers is not designed for toy lovers. When choosing such solutions, pay attention to whether the computer has a touchscreen.

Also, professionals often recommend the 15-inch Macbook Pro with Retina display for photo and video editing. It is made using IPS technology and is well suited for photo and video editing. Of course, the 13 "model is more comfortable on the road, but for everyday work, 15" is the optimal size. It's not for nothing that Apple ditched the 17-inch Macbook Pro. They are not mobile at all, and in stationary conditions you can add a good large monitor to smaller laptops. The disadvantages of the Macbook Pro include soldered on motherboard memory, which makes the upgrade impossible. But this is true for many Windows Ultrabooks as well. Mobility requires sacrifice. Also, Macbook users with Retina displays often complain that, despite the 2880x1800 resolution, few elements can be placed on the screen, as if the resolution is only 1440x900.

But scaling Windows 8 laptops are still worse. For example, even Photoshop Creative Cloud still doesn't support high-resolution screens. And that's not to mention the fact that working with high resolution in Photoshop becomes significantly slower.

Screen quality is determined by the brightness of the backlight, its uniformity in different parts of the screen, contrast, and coverage of the sRGB and AdobeRGB color spectra. Please note that full coverage of the sRGB spectrum on laptops with IPS matrix is possible only when using an RGB LED screen (the backlight uses 3 colors at once, not one). At the same time, there are also high-quality TN screens on laptops, which cover sRGB by 95-98%, but they cannot boast of large viewing angles.

The most worthy alternatives to the Macbook Pro are

Dell Precision M3800 Mobile Workstation - Slim and light laptop(approx.2 kg) with QHD + touchscreen (3200x1800), 4th generation Intel Core i7 Haswell processor, NVIDIA Quadro graphics.

Dell XPS 15 with QHD + (3200x1800) PPS technology, 4th Gen Intel Core Haswell (i3-i7) processor, NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M graphics.

From monstrous workstations, you can also include in this list

HP Zbook 15 with FullHD DreamColor Display (1920 x 1080), 4th Gen Intel Core i7-4800MQ processor, NVIDIA Quadro graphics, Thunderbolt port.
Please note that you need a DreamColor screen, as the regular one covers about 90% of the sRGB.

Premiercolor (15.6 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen, LP156WF3 SLB1-B2-B3)

Dell Precision M4700 Premiercolor (15.6 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen).
The standard FHD panel does not completely cover sRGB.

Dell Precision M6600 Premiercolor (17.3 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen, LP173WF3 SLB1-B2-B3)

Dell Precision M6700 Premiercolor (17.3 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen)

HP EliteBook 8560w (15.6 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen)

HP EliteBook 8560w Dreamcolor (15.6 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen, LP156WF3 SLB1-B2-B3)

HP EliteBook 8570w DreamColor (15.6 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen)

HP EliteBook 8760w DreamColor (17.3 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen, LP173WF3 SLB1-B2-B3)

HP EliteBook 8770w DreamColor (17.3 ", 1920x1080, IPS, matte screen)

Lenovo Thinkpad W530 (15.6 ", 1920x1080, matte screen)

Please note that the screens of the above laptops may be different, even with a resolution of less than 1920x1080. In general, it is very strange that in this segment there is still a resolution of 1368x768, especially on 17-inch screens.

Dell QHD + screens are more suitable for professional photo and video work than FullHD screens. And it's not just about the resolution, but about other characteristics.

The Dell Precision M6700 has a wide IPS color gamut with RGB backlighting. The M6700's screen even covers NTSC, which is wider than AdobeRGB. Some even think that the colors of the M6700 are oversaturated, as they have only seen screens covering 45-72% NTSC before.

The Dell M4800's QHD + screen covers sRGB, but sRGB only covers 72% of NTSC.
The Dell M4800's FullHD screen only covers 60% NTSC and has a lower contrast.

More laptops (mainly with IPS, MVA / PVA matrices), which were considered:

Sony VAIO Fit 15A multi-flip (15 ", FullHD, IPS, glossy) - The sRGB color gamut is approximately 97%.

Sony VAIO Fit 15A multi-flip (15 ", 2880x1620, IPS, glossy) - Color gamut covers 86% sRGB and 62.8% Adobe RGB, and has 99.6% sRGB and 68 gamut. 6% of Adobe RGB volume.

Sony VAIO Fit SVF15A1S2ES (15 ", FullHD, Glossy) - The display cannot reproduce the color spectra of AdobeRGB or sRGB.

Acer Aspire R572G (15 ", FullHD, i7-4500U, NVidia GeForce GT 750M) - Color gamut covers 96% sRGB. Acer offers good characteristics for their money, but in general, the quality of the products is quite low.

Acer Aspire V5-572pg

Acer Aspire V5-573G - (15 "IPS screen from AU Optronics, FullHD, matte) - Over 90% sRGB color gamut.

Acer Aspire V5-573P (15 ") - Over 90% sRGB color space.

Acer Aspire R7 R7-571G - The color gamut of the LCD screen covers 80.25% of the sRGB space and about 59% of the AdobeRGB space.

Samsung ATIV Book 8 (PLS) - Display cannot reproduce sRGB and AdobeRGB spaces, although sRGB is 92% covered. Intel Ivy Bridge.

Samsung Ativ Book 6 680Z5E-X01US (15 ", FullHD, PLS, glossy, touch) - The display cannot reproduce sRGB and AdobeRGB spaces, although sRGB is covered by 81% and AdobeRGB by 60%. IPS or PLS technologies are not used. Intel Ivy Bridge.

Lenovo Ideapad Y580 20994BU - Covers 91% sRGB

Lenovo Ideapad Y510p 59400120 - Covers 82% sRGB and 56% AdobeRGB

Dell Inspiron 15-7537. 7000 series (1920x1080, IPS, glossy) The color gamut satisfactorily covers sRGB (about 80-90%) and AdobeRGB.

Lenovo ThinkPad X1

Lenovo IdeaPad u530 FHD

Razer Blade

Toshiba Qosmio X870

Asus G75VW

Asus G750JW - LCD color gamut covers 80% sRGB and less than 60% AdobeRGB

MSI GT70

Samsung Series 7 Gamer

Vizio CT15 with 1920x1080 IPS matrices

HP Envy 15-17. Recently, the Envy series has ceased to be elite (now the Specter series is elite), so panels and other components are increasingly used of not very good quality.

Gigabyte P35K Matte. There are no reviews.

Gigabyte U35F-CF3. There are no reviews.

Gigabyte P34G with 1920x1080 AHVA matrix (similar to IPS). The color gamut covers 63% of AdobeRGB.

Gigabyte's P25W with a 1920x1080 matrix. 59% AdobeRGB color gamut. Not suitable for professional photo editing.

Chillblast Photo OC Mobile

System76 Galago UltraPro (OEM Clevo W740SU, Ubuntu, 14.1 ", 1920x1080, matte ColorPRO)

System76 Gazelle Professional (OEM Clevo, Ubuntu, 15 ", 1920x1080, glossy ColorPRO).
Apparently, the B140HAN01 screen is based on AHVA technology (this is not TN or IPS) with a balanced color reproduction and a color gamut that largely covers sRGB. Suitable for basic graphics and image editing.

System76 Bonobo Extreme (OEM Clevo, Ubuntu, 17.3 ", 1920x1080, matte ColorPRO)

Sager, Eurocom, Schenker XMG, DNS, DevilTech, Kobalt, Mythlogic, AVADirect, Malibal, One, PC Specialist, Falcon Northwest, DiTech, Origin, Digital Storm, FullRange, Bullman, Nexoc, Metabox, BTO, XoticPC, ... ( OEM Clevo)

Dell Alienware 17 (1920x1080 Glossy TN) - Covers 97% sRGB. But the viewing angles are small, since the TN technology is used.
Some models have RGB LED screens.

Dell Alienware M18x R2 (1920x1080 Glossy TN) - Covers 97% sRGB. But the vertical viewing angles are small, since the TN technology is used.

Toshiba Qosmio 17 (1920x1080, TN) - Color gamut covers 65% of Adobe RGB and 96% sRGB. But the viewing angles are small, since the TN technology is used.

Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook U904 (14 ", 3200x1800, Sharp IGZO)

Samsung Ativ Book 9 NP930X5J (FullHD, Haswell) - just announced at CES, will appear no earlier than February-March 2014, the quality of the screen is still unknown.

In general, a very interesting picture is obtained. Laptops with a screen well suited for photo and video editing are often on the order of $ 2,000 or more in the US. This is especially true for heavy, reliable, but rather ugly workstations. Very rarely, these models can be bought for less than the allowed duty-free import limit in international mail. Basically, either old models, or refurbished ones, or used ones fit into the 1000 euro limit.

More budgetary Asus, Samsung and Sony do not cover sRGB, AdobeRGB so well. But they can be good compromise options, although other options are better for professional photography and video work.

Personally, I settled on Samsung ATIV Book 8. Although it has a previous generation Core i7-3635QM CPU, it is practically the same in terms of performance and power consumption as the Core i7-4700QM. Haswell has more powerful Intel HD4600 graphics, but in this laptop In addition to the built-in Intel HD4000, a discrete video card Radeon HD 8770M is also installed (in other countries, video is offered AMD card Radeon HD 8870M).

In second place, I had the Sony VAIO Fit 15A. It has a screen of course with better sRGB coverage (especially for the expensive version with a resolution of 2880x1620), but the Nvidia GForce GT-735 video card is weak, the processor is weaker (although the new Haswell architecture with lower power consumption), the amount of RAM is fixed, articulated the design does not inspire confidence. Plus, this laptop has a lot of complaints about the quality of Wi-Fi and the disconnected touch screen, although for me both of these parameters are practically unimportant.

Which laptop or computer do you recommend for photo and video editing?

(April 23, 2014 Patch)
Added a couple of Acer laptops with over 90% sRGB color space. Perhaps, when buying, I would look exactly in their direction.